<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pinyon Partners LLC: Strategic foresight research &#38; consulting &#187; e-bikes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinyonpartners.com/tag/e-bikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinyonpartners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging transportation modes will require more than new tech</title>
		<link>http://www.pinyonpartners.com/2010/01/emerging-transportation-modes-will-require-more-than-new-tech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pinyonpartners.com/2010/01/emerging-transportation-modes-will-require-more-than-new-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinyonpartners.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an interesting article in yesterday&#8217;s WSJ about the meteoric rise of electric bikes (e-bikes) in China. A thread running throughout, particularly in the expert and on-the-ground commentary, was that these e-bikes (some of which can reach 25 miles an hour but can be driven with no formal certification) are deadly hazards. Originally launched [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />There was an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703657604575005140241751852.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_lifestyle">interesting article</a> in yesterday&#8217;s WSJ about the meteoric rise of electric bikes (e-bikes) in China. A thread running throughout, particularly in the expert and on-the-ground commentary, was that these e-bikes (some of which can reach 25 miles an hour but can be driven with no formal certification) are deadly hazards. Originally launched as a way &#8211; and a successful one at that &#8211; to combat emissions and offer an alternative transport option to the automobile, the e-bikes are now seen as a scourge. They been alternatively banned, allowed with modifications, restricted, and encouraged.</p>
<p>The second biggest complaint is that the e-bikes can reach significant speed, and when they do impact a bike, a pedestrian, or anyother object bigger than a breadbox, they can kill it. The biggest complaint, though, seems to be &#8211; as one interviewee noted &#8211; that e-bikers are  &#8221;totally devoid of conscience and respect for the law,&#8221; and barrel through intersections with little concern for other traffic or people.</p>
<p>Technologies, particularly those that move us from point-a to point-b, can be enormously disruptive bumping up as they do against existing infrastructures, laws, and practices. However, as early work in our new, soon-to-be-announced research stream on mobility and the future demonstrates, even more important is a recognition on behalf of transportation planners that cultural change and educational initiatives have to be included in any rapid development plan. China&#8217;s on-going experience with e-bikes is a superb example of this. The issue is less the speed or size of the e-bikes, but the practices of their drivers &#8211; something that has to be addressed at the outset, and then nurtured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pinyonpartners.com/2010/01/emerging-transportation-modes-will-require-more-than-new-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
